Why this Blog?
A place where I can lament the changing times; for eccentric comments on current affairs and for unfashionable views, expressed I hope, in cogent style; also occasional cris de coeur largely concerned, I regret to say, with myself.
Comments
Saturday, 29 November 2008
Bandits IV Revisted
A Bit of Fun for a Change - The Uber-Tuber
Tuesday, 25 November 2008
Good News
Sunday, 23 November 2008
More on the Sirius Star
In Case You Didn't Know...
Wacko Jacko Reinvents Himself?
Le Hot Dog
Saturday, 22 November 2008
An Islamic Twerp Raises his Profile
Thursday, 20 November 2008
$7,000,000,000
Monday, 17 November 2008
"Realeconomik"
"Newspeak" in Russia Today
"And sure enough, at a time when their country is locked in its worst financial crisis in a decade, they [The Russian people] are more optimistic about the economy than they have ever been. According to opinion polls, 57 per cent reckon it is flourishing, up from 53 per cent in July.
The survey's findings are a triumph for the state, proving that the Kremlin has not lost its touch when it comes to manipulating fact. Obeying orders from the top, Russian television has banned the use of words such as "crisis", "decline" and "devaluation. "
Soon no doubt, official policy will be that belief in fairies is mandatory!
One could I suppose, characterise recent Russian history in Orwellian terms:
From Animal Farm to 1984 in twenty years!
Until the next time
Sunday, 16 November 2008
Strictly Come Dancing? I think Not
I hate once again to give you a rant, but once again here it is! It is about those wonderful, progressive, humanitarian peoples, full of the milk of human kindness, tolerance and generosity, guided (so they say) by their holy book.
"The dancing of men and women together is illegal and totally against Islam. We neither killed them nor injured them, but only whipped them according to the Islamic law."
Wednesday, 12 November 2008
Free Speech: President Sarkozy Eats Babies!
Monday, 10 November 2008
Damn' Right!
Saturday, 8 November 2008
US Presidential Update
"He also said that the missile defence project would continue," the statement added.
When asked about the declaration, McDonough said that the US president-elect had had "a good conversation" with Mr Kaczynski about the American-Polish alliance and discussed missile defence, but "made no commitment on it".
"His position is as it was throughout the campaign, that he supports deploying a missile defence system when the technology is proved to be workable," Mr McDonough told the Associated Press.
This is bullshit: the US has already declared that the system is in no way intended or designed to, shoot down Russian missiles - indeed I recall that the US invited senior Russian military personnel to inspect the facilities etc. Politics in action No 1.
Here's No 2: concerning Iran. The International Herald Tribune, one of my favourite sources for news items, is associated with the New York Times and Boston Globe. These are not right-wing publications and indeed I get the impression that they are more inclined to a Democratic point of view. In an article published today I read:
Iran's head of parliament on Saturday criticised U.S. President-elect Barack Obama for saying its development of a nuclear weapon would be "unacceptable" and repeated the Islamic state's call for fundamental policy change.
"Obama must know that the change he talks about is a fundamental change and not changing of colours or tactics," Parliament Speaker Ali Larijani said in comments on state radio.
Larijani, echoing Iran's official line, called on Obama to carry out his campaign slogans of U.S. foreign policy change, including change to U.S. dealings with Iran.
"Repeating objections to Iran's nuclear programme will be taking a step in the wrong direction."
Obama, at his first news conference since Tuesday's election, said on Friday an international effort must be made to keep Iran from developing a nuclear weapon, adding that the country's development of a nuclear weapon was "unacceptable."
President-elect Obama is an American, further he is about to become President and Commander-in-Chief of the USA. As I wrote on 5th November, he is not likely to be a cuddly little pussycat; his achievements to date suggest that he is a tough egg and I see no reason why he should change. The "touchy-feelies" should take note.
If you have read this far, you might wonder at the purpose of my rather lengthy introduction to this article. Well, it was just to indicate that I have no intention of publishing regular updates for the next four years!
Until the next time.
Wired.com reports today that a group of researchers at Oxford University has compiled a list of "The ten most irritating expressions in the English language."
The list is as follows:
Readers are invited to add their own choices in the comments section. My contribution to this most satisfying project are as follows:
"Parenting", and even worse "birthing" - one bears children, one does not "birth" them.
"Gifted"(in the verbal sense): pathetic: What's the matter with "given"?
"Having said that" or "that said". Irritating.
"Chair" meaning "chairman"; "actor" meaning "actress"
Finally "innit" as in e.g. "I'm goin' dahn uh pub, innit". Horrible.
More have come to mind since I posted my comment:
"Going forward" e.g. "I should like you to take more responsibility going forward." Rubbish.
"Negative growth" Pathetic euphemism.
"To grow one's business" Stupid.
"Logistics" - meaning transport; grossly affected and pretentious.
There'll probably be more...
Meanwhile how about a comment or two from some of you? I am sure you have your own pet hates.
Until the next time.