Why this Blog?
A place where I can lament the changing times; for eccentric comments on current affairs and for unfashionable views, expressed I hope, in cogent style; also occasional cris de coeur largely concerned, I regret to say, with myself.
Comments
Wednesday, 7 November 2012
#44...
Saturday, 7 February 2009
President Lincoln's 200th Birthday

The Lincoln memorial. Image source: hereThe International Herald Tribune is one of my favourite sources, as my readers may have noticed. I should add that I have great respect for American journalism; the "dumbing-down" of English newspapers is quickly put into sharp relief when one takes the time to read any of the great American papers - the IHT, Boston Globe, Washington Post, New York Times etc., etc.
This article from the IHT, beautifully written, gives a superb overview of Lincoln, and from an attractive angle: the piece, credited to the Associated Press is centred around the Lincoln Memorial.
Saturday, 8 November 2008
US Presidential Update

"He also said that the missile defence project would continue," the statement added.
When asked about the declaration, McDonough said that the US president-elect had had "a good conversation" with Mr Kaczynski about the American-Polish alliance and discussed missile defence, but "made no commitment on it".
"His position is as it was throughout the campaign, that he supports deploying a missile defence system when the technology is proved to be workable," Mr McDonough told the Associated Press.
This is bullshit: the US has already declared that the system is in no way intended or designed to, shoot down Russian missiles - indeed I recall that the US invited senior Russian military personnel to inspect the facilities etc. Politics in action No 1.
Here's No 2: concerning Iran. The International Herald Tribune, one of my favourite sources for news items, is associated with the New York Times and Boston Globe. These are not right-wing publications and indeed I get the impression that they are more inclined to a Democratic point of view. In an article published today I read:
Iran's head of parliament on Saturday criticised U.S. President-elect Barack Obama for saying its development of a nuclear weapon would be "unacceptable" and repeated the Islamic state's call for fundamental policy change.
"Obama must know that the change he talks about is a fundamental change and not changing of colours or tactics," Parliament Speaker Ali Larijani said in comments on state radio.
Larijani, echoing Iran's official line, called on Obama to carry out his campaign slogans of U.S. foreign policy change, including change to U.S. dealings with Iran.
"Repeating objections to Iran's nuclear programme will be taking a step in the wrong direction."
Obama, at his first news conference since Tuesday's election, said on Friday an international effort must be made to keep Iran from developing a nuclear weapon, adding that the country's development of a nuclear weapon was "unacceptable."
President-elect Obama is an American, further he is about to become President and Commander-in-Chief of the USA. As I wrote on 5th November, he is not likely to be a cuddly little pussycat; his achievements to date suggest that he is a tough egg and I see no reason why he should change. The "touchy-feelies" should take note.
If you have read this far, you might wonder at the purpose of my rather lengthy introduction to this article. Well, it was just to indicate that I have no intention of publishing regular updates for the next four years!
Until the next time.
Wednesday, 5 November 2008
#44...
Monday, 3 November 2008
United States Presidential Election 4th November 2008


Sunday, 19 October 2008
Mrs Sixpack for Veep?
