A Quick Question

Please can someone point me to a "classical" music radio station, available on-line, that does NOT play bloody opera every Saturday evening?

Thanks in advance, and,

Until the next time

"A Day that Will Live in Infamy"

Top: some of the destruction, below, a portion of the human cost

The quotation that I have used for the title of this post comes from President Franklin Roosevelt - it was part of his response to the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbour on 8th December 1941.

There have been many "days that will live in infamy" if one pauses for a few minutes' thought, but one day that should in my view "live in infamy" is 13th February 1945 - today being of course the 65th anniversary.

The event was the saturation/area/carpet-bombing of the beautiful city of Dresden in Germany.

There were in fact several attacks made from 13th to 15th February; principally, two were made by Britain's Bomber Command and two more by the USAAF VIII Bomber Command.

The attacks were planned to create a "firestorm" (as was the appalling attack on Hamburg in 1943) and in consequence, of the enormous death toll - estimates range from 25,000 to over 70,000 - many of the victims were suffocated since the fires starved them of oxygen.

When discussing these matters, it has been traditional to blame Air Chief Marshal (later Marshal of the RAF) Sir Arthur Harris who was the C-in-C of bomber command. However whilst I have little doubt that he was an enthusiastic participant, such operations were authorised at a rather higher level - Chief of the Air Staff, Marshal of the RAF, Sir Charles Portal and Prime Minister Winston Churchill were amongst the prime movers behind the operation. To these I should add Professor Lindemann, the Prime Minister's scientific advisor. Lindemann's contribution was his "Dehousing Paper" which quite clearly contains the origins of the British policy of attacking civilians, which arguably reached its apotheosis at Dresden. (Pictures: Harris top, Portal below)

Since the Red Army was approaching rapidly from the east, one justification given was that Dresden was an important railway centre and damage to communications would help the Russian advance. More unpleasantly it was well known that the city was crammed with refugees fleeing the Russian advance (for good reason it must be said) and it was expected that bombing the overcrowded city would cause chaos and confusion. In the crews' briefings, the airmen were told that Dresden was an important communications centre (which it was) and the location of important military industries which was at best a half-truth - especially three months from the end of the war.

Dresden was effectively undefended - it seems that the Germans thought that Dresden - "The Florence of the North" would not be attacked; all the anti-aircraft artillery had been removed to be used for the defence of more strategically important locations. There were a few fighter aircraft available, though the ten that were "scrambled" would not have been able to do much against hundreds of bombers, even if they had arrived in time, which they didn't.

Now please read the following extracts from the 1907 Hague Convention:

Art. 25

The attack or bombardment, by whatever means, of towns, villages, dwellings or buildings which are undefended is prohibited

Art. 27

In sieges and bombardments all necessary steps must be taken to spare, as far as possible, buildings dedicated to religion, art, science, or charitable purposes, historic monuments, hospitals, and places where the sick and wounded are collected, provided they are not being used at the time for military purposes[...]

I stress that these come from the 1907 Hague convention - the Geneva Conventions arose after the war.

Art. 27 concludes with the following paragraph:

It is the duty of the besieged to indicate the presence of such buildings or places by distinctive and visible signs which shall be notified to the enemy beforehand.

How about this famous munitions works in the centre of the city; is this distinctive enough? (the picture shows the rebuilt building)

The Rebuilt Dresden Semperoper
Source

I hardly think that the Allies could reasonably claim that the presence of this wonderful building - just one of many in Dresden - had "not been notified " to them beforehand; the buildings and art treasures of Dresden were world-renowned.

At Dresden virtually everything was flattened and burned - almost razed to the ground - but with a couple of interesting exceptions: the railways, which sustained relatively light damage and indeed were soon running again and the war industries, all of which were located in the outskirts of the city and which were, apart from one or two bombs, untouched.

Certain writers (notably David Irving) have stated that American aircraft strafed civilians. However here is a very convincing refutation of this charge, which is most famously made in Irving's book 'The Destruction of Dresden'. Many years have passed since its original publication and Irving is now generally discredited as an historian.

My suspicion is that the Allies carried out this mission - a long way east from Allied territory - to show the Soviets just how powerful the Allies were: similar suggestions have been made about the detonation of the atomic bombs on Japan. It was claimed that Stalin had requested the bombing of Dresden; this is not true; Stalin was an appalling man but Dresden was a "western" operation.

There is a vast amount of material available on the atrocity of the bombing of Dresden should any reader wish to pursue the subject. This site is a good start, but much of it is distressing reading. And here's another link this time from Germany. Finally here is a site with many direct and relevant links.

And on the subject of area bombing at the time, the Allies continued; in particular I should like to mention the small town of Pforzheim, a centre of watchmaking and jewellery. This was flattened ten days after Dresden, resulting in the deaths of 17,000 people - 20% of the population. It was yet another "firestorm" operation.

*****************************

My mother and father lived in London during the war; my father was actually struck by an incendiary (magnesium) bomb whilst serving in the Auxiliary Fire Service, but survived after a miserable year in hospital. My mother and grandmother were in their house when it collapsed following the detonation of a parachute mine. Fortunately they were rescued. My parents told me that when they heard the Allied bombers departing for Germany that they felt sorry for the people there whom they knew were receiving far worse than had been the case for Great Britain, which in itself was bad enough.

*****************************

When in 1946, the sentences were announced at Nüremberg, it is said that Churchill said to his former chief military assistant General Sir Hastings Ismay: "By God Ismay, we'd better make sure that we win the next one."

And in my view, he was damned right - just re-read Article 27 of the 1907 Hague Convention above.

Until the next time

Is that all there is?

Peggy Lee famously recorded the Leiber and Stoller song whose title I have borrowed for this piece.

Here she is in 1969:



Some might find the lyric a little corny, but I think it is a great trigger for reflection.

Those of you who are similarly stimulated by this fine performance may start wondering how long you have to go.

Naturally, life insurance companies are extremely interested in this point and to this end elaborate computer models have been developed to enable them to be sure that they are not paying out a penny more than they have to (and most likely a good deal less!)

So for the curious and brave amongst you, here is a site which will help you determine your likely life-span. There are several available but this one at least raises a little smile before giving you the bad news!

Until the next time
(If there is a next time)

Nuclear Matters

I have been meaning to post on this subject for a couple of weeks, but lack of attention and problems with BLOGGER have delayed me somewhat. Actually the delay has helped because I remembered a jolly song about the elements (including the transuranic ones) composed and performed by Tom Lehrer which makes a nice complement.

The inspiration was reading a piece on Wired.com all about the potential of thorium as a much more acceptable nuclear fuel than are uranium or plutonium. The writer of the article gives some interesting background material as to why research into thorium was halted as the USA proceeded with research into U-235 and plutonium. Well worth reading and if the hypothesis is correct, then maybe we'll be able to get the cheap electricity that we were promised in the 1950s! (though I doubt it personally given the greed of the electricity companies).

In fact it seems that India, with reportedly 25% of the world's thorium reserves, is moving forward quite rapidly in this technology. Whilst it's true that there is no free lunch, it does appear that there is a number of advantages to using thorium.

As a reward for reading the above, here as promised , is Tom Lehrer's little song accompanied by an interesting video accompaniment.

Until the next time

"Pigeon Impossible"

An excellent animated video offered as a Friday divertissement.



Until the next time

Chinese Cyber Attacks

Yesterday I mentioned that Google had reported a "massive cyber attack" that took place last December and which originated in China.

More has been reported today on this subject. The report from The Daily Telegraph, includes the following:

[Advised not to go to a Human Rights Conference] He added that in two other cases he had innocently asked public security officials: “How did you know that? I have not told anyone” and was told: “Who do you think we are?”

And:

However, a spokesman for the Chinese Foreign Affairs ministry said that “Chinese laws prohibit any form of cyber attacks including hacking.”

Once again in the words of the immortal Mandy Rice-Davies "They would say that wouldn't they?"

I am absolutely convinced of the honesty of the last statement, but I do not see what that has to do with the issue under discussion!

Until the next time.